In fact, 21 percent of all respondents were neither “familiar” or “very familiar” with antivirus tools.
While those who use such products did show greater trust in their safety and privacy online, there were still a shocking number of people who did not know enough about these products.
#Download high school story hack without survey password#
Lastly, it is impossible to ignore people’s familiarity and use of cybersecurity tools like antivirus products, VPNs, and password managers. Despite high-income respondents actually losing more money in cyberattacks, they were less likely to experience a “substantial increase” in stress as a result (13 percent of high-income respondents compared to 18 percent of low-income respondents). And for high-income earners, it isn’t necessarily that the Internet is a safer place, it is merely that the Internet’s threats have less impact. Black people, Indigenous people, and People of Color (BIPOC) are more likely to have their identities stolen than White people (21 percent compared to 15 percent), and BIPOC people are the least likely to avoid any financial impact due to cybercrime (47 percent compared to 59 percent of all respondents). Not everyone’s online experience is the same, and therefore, not everyone’s feelings about the Internet are the same.įor example, women whose social media accounts get hacked are more likely than men to have that hack result in someone sending suspicious messages to friends and family (48 percent compared to 43 percent). When coupled with the fact that some populations face targeted cybercrime events in ways that other populations do not, the trend becomes clear: The answers are complex and overlapping, as revealed in this report, “The Demographics of Cybercrime,” presented by Malwarebytes in partnership with Digitunity, a nationally recognized non-profit dedicated to eliminating the technology gap, and Cybercrime Support Network, whose non-profit mission is to serve individuals and small businesses impacted by cybercrime throughout the country.īy polling 5,000 people across the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany, our report shows that not only do some populations face more types of cybercrime than others, and more frequently, but that some populations feel more emotionally burdened and are more likely to financially suffer. People everywhere, no matter their gender, race, income level, education, or age, deserve to feel safe and private online. And all of it, today, often requires the transfer of sensitive information like names, addresses, and credit card numbers.
Applying for a job, filing taxes, purchasing groceries, scheduling a doctor’s appointment, checking bank accounts, even voicing concerns to government representatives-all of it, today, can and does happen online. If these types of sentiments on safety and privacy applied to, say, walking on the sidewalk or driving to work, they would rightfully cause a collective moment of reflection: How can we accept this level of uncertainty? Why do we continue to make people do things they are clearly uncomfortable doing?
Using the Internet has become less and less optional for everyday living and more and more a requirement. Overall, 50 percent of people say they do not feel private online, and 31 percent do not feel safe online. Some groups more than others, and how, while making the Internet essential for all, we only made it safe for some.“ “This is the story of how cybercrime hurts It is a story of how money (or its absence) changes our sense of safety, and how education can prepare some for a safer, more private experience online. It is a story of how Black people, Indigenous populations, and all people of color see some of the barriers they already face in the physical world transposed into cyberspace. It is a story of women feeling dramatically less safe and less private on the Internet than men.
0 kommentar(er)
